News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How rare is a Supreme Court breach? Very rare by wwweston on Tuesday May 03, 2022 @01:05AM (#31244849)
"I didn't think the leopards would eat my face!"

https://www.freep.com/story/opinion/columnists/nancy-kaffer/...

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/republican-marria...

https://jezebel.com/yes-republicans-are-coming-for-gay-marri...

https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1521296185977417732

https://twitter.com/notstevenwhite/status/152129472044988825...

One of my acquaintances who's a lawyer says in particular certain personal rights to privacy/autonomy that Griswold is built around is a target of the federalist society for a variety of reasons, some of which are business related. Can't remember the details but if you combine a wealth/profit-driven interest with a social conservatives christian patriarchy, the idea that Griswold is just safe because the court wouldn't go there looks pretty thin.

The courts are going to go for broke here, they've got a certain makeup that's been in the making for decades and McConnell's manipulations and Trump's victory got them across the finish line. They're not kidding around with power, they're going to use it.

EDIT: Downvoters, while we're all entitled to the use of that pointy disapproval button, if you think it's fundamentally incorrect to state that Obergfell or Griswold are going to be targeted by the court, you have no idea how thrilled I'd be to be persuaded you're correct. Please, make your case.

There are no comments on this comment yet.