News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by TimH on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @08:51AM (#312329)
That article is pre 2001
Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by mtrimpe on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @08:56AM (#312333)
That explains this baffling part of the conversation... Squeak and Disney?

Willison: Yes. Something called MEL . And something called Squeak, which is being created at Disney.

van Rossum: Isn't Squeak a Smalltalk derivative?

Willison: Yes. It's used in movie production and 3D graphics, as is MEL. It seems like there's an explosion of small, single-purpose languages.

Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by greyman on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @10:32AM (#312402)
I have only a very rough knowledge of Python. In which kind of software development would you choose Python and why?
Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by silentbicycle on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @11:29AM (#312452)
Short answer: In most places you would otherwise use Perl, Ruby, C, C++, or Java. It's not as fast as C or OCaml (except in programs which are almost entirely calls to libraries, e.g. string-heavy stuff), but you can rewrite the hotspots in C later (if you ever actually need to), and the overall development time will be much shorter. Even if you never use it for anything else, Python is an excellent prototyping language.

For a more in-depth answer, look at these:

http://python.org/about/

http://diveintopython.org/

Also, see the standard library's module index, which is one of the places the language really shines: http://docs.python.org/modindex.html

Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by fedecarg on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @05:32PM (#312862)
Guys, please stop posting old stuff...
Re:An Interview with Guido van Rossum by timmorgan on Tuesday September 23, 2008 @05:55PM (#312883)
Wow this is old.