> Not sure if I can disclose further than that.
how hypocrite of you to confirm you know more, but don't want to give out any information
why are you confirming then?
You have a very curious definition of super-mod. One would assume a super-mod needs to be a mod first.
> confirm you know more, but don't want to give out any information
People are sometimes entrusted with non-public information they aren’t at liberty to disclose, at least without asking for explicit permission first. Still, when they see false accusations thrown around they sometimes would like to do something. I thought this is a forum for adults, that much should be obvious.
what matters is that there's a selected group of users, who can leverage capabilities unavailable and unknown to anybody else in the group
again, if you won't be disclosing any info, why do you mention that you have anything to disclose?
They've said enough, and there simply are situations where that's all you can say, and it's neither pointless nor wrong, nor even unusual or all that remarkable. It's common even.
maybe it’s just 5 people, who knows?
holy cow
The details would be even better, but I can think of at least a few ways a person might become aware of a fact like that without being able or morally obligated to disclose more than that heads-up, and without even themselves having necessarily ever done anything wrong.
It's not the DaVinci code.
> without the involvement of a “super-mod” or anyone affiliated with YC.
Also, I tried fig the first time round and was not impressed.