Re:24 Claims of Lodsys '565 Patent Rejected
by xenophanes on Monday October 17, 2011 @04:32PM
(#3122319)
Yeah that's the point. Sometimes semantics distinctions matter to the law. So can you just decrement by a negative number to get around it, legally?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:24 Claims of Lodsys '565 Patent Rejected
by nobody314159 on Monday October 17, 2011 @04:45PM
(#3122377)
Semantics especially matter in patents.
There is a famous historical case where a patent specified a horizontal beam - since you can never have a perfect horizontal beam in a real machine everyone was free to break it.
It's why every second word in a patent is "substantially"