News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy Creek. Parent comment

Re:The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy... by rayiner on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:09PM (#31209433)
This is the relevant text:

> 3. Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3…

I read this to prohibit discussion of sexual attraction with kids third grade and under. I don’t read this to prohibit incidental mention of someone’s same-sex spouse.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Contractual Impossibility of Unwinding Disney’s Reedy... by psyklic on Saturday April 30, 2022 @03:55AM (#31214193)
In practice, there is no problem if a teacher shows video incidentally including a straight couple. If it contains a gay couple, however, suddenly that could count as "classroom instruction" of sexual orientation. The teachers are left with the unenviable position of interpreting a vague law, resulting in it being safest to exclusively show kids straight couples.
[ Parent | on HN ]