News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?. Parent comment

Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal? by thfuran on Friday April 29, 2022 @02:44PM (#31209125)
That's the correct reading but I'm not sure just how much leeway "including but not limited to" tends to get. Does that, in practice, mean "things like the following" or does it mean "literally anything"?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal? by fjfbsufhdvfy on Friday April 29, 2022 @02:48PM (#31209171)
It refers to the previous section of the same sentence, these things are given as examples of "technical, diagnostic, usage and related information". It'd be up to a court to decide whether something not part of the examples could be reasonably called that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal? by Jiro on Friday April 29, 2022 @05:37PM (#31210836)
It means "things like the following". https://applawyers.org/blog/10317283
[ Parent | on HN ]