News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by jameshart on Friday April 29, 2022 @08:20AM (#31204201)
Honestly I'm surprised it's acceptable for resumes presented to me as a hiring manager to even have names on them, let alone photos. Humans are hardwired to make snap judgements about people based on a first visual impression, and a photo at the top of a resume will massively color the rest of your assessment.
Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by specialist on Friday April 29, 2022 @08:51AM (#31204434)
Emphatic agreement.

Ages ago, I witnessed the execs toss resumes with "funny sounding names". One of those anecdotal experiences that made a huge impression on me. Having grown up surrounded by immigrants and misc POC -- people are just people -- chucking resumes based on non-whiteness really pissed me off.

This issue always reminds me of symphony auditions. To remove bias, candidates perform behind a screen.

The caveat that gives me pause is the burden of filtering out "spam" resumes. It was such a chore the last time I helped with hiring. I can only imagine it's gotten worse.

Perhaps resumes should be deanonymized by HR. Two step process. First, potential applicants are authenticated. Next, PII is stripped before the hiring team gets the bulk of the resumes.

But what do I know? Hiring and interviewing is snafu everywhere these days. Adding more hoops and friction will probably fly like a lead zeppelin.

Re:Hacking attractiveness biases in hiring? The role of beau... by spacexsucks on Friday April 29, 2022 @08:48AM (#31204417)
No names and photos on resumes is the way to go. I dont need to see who you know kn LinkedIn either.