Re:Increased cardiovascular events in Israel during vaccine ...
by alimov on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:35AM
(#31202429)
I’m not very knowledgeable about this, but I was wondering if MIT (professor?) co-authorship precludes papers from coming to the wrong conclusions? Or is it we’ll know that when a co-author is from MIT that the paper is as rigorous and objective as possible?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Increased cardiovascular events in Israel during vaccine ...
by cft on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:39AM
(#31202454)
I am just comparing the potential veracity of a peer reviewed article in Nature of two MIT authors and one emergency physician from Ben Gurion University with a one line dismissal and a newspaper link. Which one is "we'll [sic] known" to be more plausible?
Re:Increased cardiovascular events in Israel during vaccine ...
by fsh on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:54AM
(#31202545)
This is not published in Nature. Scientific reports is much less prestigious and selective.
Re:Increased cardiovascular events in Israel during vaccine ...
by buildbot on Friday April 29, 2022 @11:37AM
(#31206511)
I said possibly less reliable because of some interesting data mismatches, not dismissing it. considering then other comments addressing the flaws in their stats, it seems quite wrong.
I have a Masters degree from UBC and work as a data scientist, not that actually matters…
Re:Increased cardiovascular events in Israel during vaccine ...
by cft on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:03PM
(#31209346)
Can you point to the specific error in the paper?
I have a PhD from MIT, but I am not sure why "UBC" is relevant to the paper in question.