Re:I employed a California resident, so now I’m subject to i...
by azernik on Thursday April 28, 2022 @01:07PM
(#31195091)
An employee in a state is physical presence
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I employed a California resident, so now I’m subject to i...
by pclmulqdq on Thursday April 28, 2022 @02:01PM
(#31195899)
Current US employment and business laws are not set up well for remote work at all. Several states say different things about this, and there is probably going to be a reckoning on this subject soon.
Re:I employed a California resident, so now I’m subject to i...
by dismantlethesun on Friday April 29, 2022 @12:04PM
(#31206942)
I don’t think I should be physically present in the USA just because I transferred money to a USA citizen in exchange for services.
However USA law defines this, I think is wrong. That’s what I’m saying.
The USA is an outlier in many ways. It taxes it’s citizens outside of the country, forces awkward bilateral trade agreements , and is not at all harmonized with work laws of other countries.
An office is a physical presence to me. A single person working from their own house is not.