News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are the Great Lakes really inland seas? by Scoundreller on Thursday April 28, 2022 @09:59AM (#31192529)
Most likely only a little bit would actually be piped. You’d just stop water from entering one watershed and send it into another and let gravity do its work. You would lose more to evaporation; but that happens to water in pipes too if they’re above ground.

Would love to see the numbers.

It’s fun looking at rivers from the Rocky Mountains in California that don’t make it to the ocean anymore.

I recently proposed a transatlantic natural gas pipeline and people thought I was insane, but it would only be ~5x longer than the longest existing underwater natgas pipeline, which doesn’t sound impossibly viable.

Re:Are the Great Lakes really inland seas? by Balero on Thursday April 28, 2022 @11:16AM (#31193516)
Good point about the river re-direction.

> I recently proposed a transatlantic natural gas pipeline and people thought I was insane, but it would only be ~5x longer than the longest existing underwater natgas pipeline, which doesn’t sound impossibly viable.

Nordstream is 759 Miles. Newfoundland to Ireland is 1900 Miles!

Re:Are the Great Lakes really inland seas? by Scoundreller on Thursday April 28, 2022 @03:17PM (#31196955)
Only problem is you gotta get the gas to the east coast on the americas, and that’s where a lot of the demand is already.

Though it makes you wonder what kind of gas fields might exist along the way. As it goes, we exploit the oil and flare the gas. Pffft.

Re:Are the Great Lakes really inland seas? by 83 on Thursday April 28, 2022 @11:18AM (#31193558)
I feel the transatlantic gas pipe wouldnt be viable just for the fact that Russian subs/ships would have a field day "accidentally" setting anchor on it and breaking it to keep their economy relevant.