Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean may not be safe

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by Reason077 on Thursday April 28, 2022 @09:09AM (#31192003)

The idea is that the strontium-90, carbon-14, etc can be filtered out, leaving just the tritiated water to be discharged.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by pera on Thursday April 28, 2022 @09:17AM (#31192091)

According to the article I cited:

> Greenpeace said it had confirmed with Tepco that the system was not designed to remove carbon-14

Maybe there are updates on this matter but I couldn't find anything online.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by Reason077 on Thursday April 28, 2022 @09:21AM (#31192125)

Sounds like you're right about the carbon-14:

"C-14 also cannot be removed by ALPS, but its concentration is far lower than its regulatory standard for discharge."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by tablespoon on Thursday April 28, 2022 @12:50PM (#31194868)

Is the carbon-14 an actual health concern, or just a PITA for future archeologists?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by gus_massa on Thursday April 28, 2022 @03:09PM (#31196869)

Nitpicking: The archeologist already have tables to fix variations of the C_14 vs C_12 in the past https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_calibration

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Japan’s plan to dump nuclear waste into the pacific ocean... by xyzzy21 on Thursday April 28, 2022 @02:29PM (#31196313)

Except if you consider the "entropy" of doing that, you have an enormous amount of energy inputs required.

[ Parent | on HN ]