News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by wwweston on Monday April 25, 2022 @04:16PM (#31159992)
"Human" and "pseudonymous" aren't exclusive, and there's a number of ways to verify the former w/o documenting real identity.

Keeping things as human only as possible means that you can't scale-up apparent vocality of opinion via automation.

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by schrodinger on Monday April 25, 2022 @04:21PM (#31160065)
Interesting approach I learned about today… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by 58x14 on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @01:15PM (#31170209)
Thanks for this - I've had a fuzzy assumption this was occurring over the last decade. I've noticed variations of this strategy to swarm certain trending posts on various platforms (particularly reddit) with an assortment of low-effort, vaguely positive and pro-CCP comments. Lately I've seen this frequently on Shanghai posts about the extreme situation unfolding there.

Funny, I've also noticed this strategy is very common in the cryptocurrency space, especially in Telegram groups. Signal-to-noise is abysmal.

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by heavyset_go on Monday April 25, 2022 @09:03PM (#31162818)
Anonymity goes directly against Twitter's advertising revenue model that requires targeted advertising. Platforms want to know who you are so they can collate data from disparate sources and appease their partners.

Twitter could verify that you're a human in order to let you use the platform, but they don't, they instead verify your identity. Google does the same thing, and Facebook, too. They want a phone number tied to real accounts with cell providers or photo IDs.

It's not just about bot prevention, it's about monetizing their user base.

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by wwweston on Monday April 25, 2022 @11:41PM (#31163702)
Of the three accounts I’ve created — one as recent as 2020 — I can’t recall any verification process which so much as required me to put in a real name.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by heavyset_go on Monday April 25, 2022 @11:45PM (#31163719)
I had to give Twitter my phone number on a relatively new account after a few days. Couldn't do anything on the platform until I verified my phone number, and they wouldn't take a throwaway number.

At one point Facebook wanted my driver's license to use the platform after a while, so I just stopped using it.

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by tshaddox on Monday April 25, 2022 @04:27PM (#31160150)
I’m a human who can create a bot to tweet on my account. Are you suggesting that Twitter would require a captcha on every tweet?
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by trompetenaccoun on Monday April 25, 2022 @09:49PM (#31163102)
No, I think what they're suggesting is preventing actors from creating thousands of accounts and having bots run them. Although it's not as easy as accounts can still be bought or hacked of course.

There are some approaches that suggest something similar as you say, not for every post but an occasional proof that you're human, like once a month. Check out IDENA.