News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Resumes are dangerous? by bjourne on Monday April 25, 2022 @03:29PM (#31159492)
No. The reason is because when I and others investigate some code we like to make small refactorings as we go along. Change a variable name here, redefine a type here, and see what breaks. If you think those changes could ever be pushed upstream you save them in a github repo. That it looks "random" to hiring managers is something I've never thought of.
Re:Resumes are dangerous? by chakkepolja on Monday April 25, 2022 @07:53PM (#31162381)
We are talking about different repos then. The ones I am talking about have no commits or refactoring going on, usually they are even with upstream or some commits behind. I was puzzled why they were forking these repos while a git clone will perfectly do.

Maybe a location thing. I am from India.

Re:Resumes are dangerous? by scaryclam on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @11:04AM (#31168355)
Quite often people will fork so they can tinker locally. It's not odd to see forked repos without any changes, it's just someone being curious or wanting to make a contribution but not having time to go through with it.