News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by garbagetime on Monday April 25, 2022 @11:42AM (#31156457)
Another question:

Is extremism inherently wrong?

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by TMWNN on Monday April 25, 2022 @03:58PM (#31159758)
>I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!

—Barry Goldwater, 1964

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by bastardoperator on Monday April 25, 2022 @12:19PM (#31156995)
If you have to ask the question you already know the answer...
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by garbagetime on Monday April 25, 2022 @12:26PM (#31157121)
I don't see the logic there, but in case it adds to the conversation, I will say that I think that it is fairly clear that extremism is not inherently a bad thing, unless it is defined as such (rather than literally) - in which case I think the word would lose most of its utility in conversations like this.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by rosmax_1337 on Monday April 25, 2022 @01:11PM (#31157811)
I find "extremism" to be used as a pejorative that is better interpreted as "non-mainstream" nowadays. Most people labeled as extremist are simply just that, not mainstream. Infact it is quite cynical of those within the mainstream to use this pejorative, since it by sleight of hand assosciates any ideas that the mainstream does not hold with what most others see as "violent extremists, wearing white robes and/or bombing subway stations".