News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by ssl232 on Monday April 25, 2022 @09:58AM (#31154817)
It's not $10 per site, it's $10 one off. You would get the money back almost immediately if your request is not abusive. I'd be interested to know how many twitter users couldn't scrape together a once off $10.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by CydeWeys on Monday April 25, 2022 @10:08AM (#31154982)
So who's going to fund this adjudicatory system? Because lots of little $10 deposits, that are fully refundable, won't do it.
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by ssl232 on Monday April 25, 2022 @10:58AM (#31155783)
You should ask Michael Saylor to be sure how he proposes this will all work, but he did mention his company (MicroStrategy) spends $1M/year on DDOS mitigation. I expect if Lightning ends up as cheap and fast as he and others are saying it will be, it could be funded by companies as a cost of doing business in the same way they fund the electricity and hardware for serving their websites.

It's actually the sort of thing I could see CloudFlare etc. providing, so each website doesn't need to implement it themselves.

Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by devteambravo on Monday April 25, 2022 @10:12AM (#31155051)
Who decides whether your request is abusive?
Re:Twitter set to accept Musk's $43B offer – sources by ssl232 on Monday April 25, 2022 @10:54AM (#31155727)
The site. They stake their reputation on being fair. Unfair sites will lose users. This is basically what happens already with moderation, it's just adding a small monetary penalty to bad actors to discourage them.