That's a good point, but it does raise the question of how best to transmit notes or information with anyone who stumbles on the repo.
I understand these platform-specific features to be a way to show you do your homework and can integrate third party tooling or workflows into your own things.
Re:Resumes are dangerous?
by theshrike79 on Monday April 25, 2022 @03:04PM
(#31159242)
Adding a README.md isn't just GitHub specific, it's a good idea to add it to any project you do.
My memory sucks, that's why I write down what I'm planning to do with a project into the readme. It doesn't need to be super fancy with images and status badges and all that jazz.
This is perfectly enough:
projectname
===========
This fizzes
TODO
----
Add buzzing later
Check if bazzing library is ready for productionThis is true, README has a long history.
However, I strongly associate Readme.md, designed for a web based intro view with Github.
It would be interesting to get the real history, because it could be a fluke of timing.
I’d bet if we look back at old source forge projects created pre-github there would be a strong correlation with the markdown version added and the rise of github. (Of course this could be a timing fluke)
Re:Resumes are dangerous?
by theshrike79 on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @01:28AM
(#31164258)
Markdown was invented around 2004, Github was founded in 2008.
This is a strange one, I am not sure why the priorities of a third party hosting platform should take priority. Many people use it is more of a cloud repo backup than a social sharing site.
So why knock people for using it differently? It does not measure their understanding of how Github works.