News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dirty straw. Parent comment

Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by threatofrain on Monday April 25, 2022 @12:07AM (#31150650)
<!doctype html>

<meta charset="utf-8">

<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

Content.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by SahAssar on Monday April 25, 2022 @04:28AM (#31151842)
You need a <title> for it to be spec compliant.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by rchaud on Monday April 25, 2022 @01:48PM (#31158302)
And for it to show up in a search engine's results page without looking like a strange URL you'd associate with a file in a CMS media library (s3.aws.com, or wp-content/2022/04/01/image.jpg)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by threatofrain on Tuesday April 26, 2022 @04:17PM (#31172633)
My mistake!

https://google.github.io/styleguide/htmlcssguide.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by victorvscn on Monday April 25, 2022 @09:20AM (#31154151)
Only on XHTML, actually.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web 2.0 sucks sharp pebbles and canal water through a dir... by SahAssar on Monday April 25, 2022 @11:39AM (#31156408)
Source? Seems to be required based on https://validator.w3.org/nu/ which is also linked as the validator to use for WHATWG from https://whatwg.org/validator/
[ Parent | on HN ]