Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptive to a deal

Re:Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptiv... by panick21_ on Sunday April 24, 2022 @08:53PM (#31149717)

> SpaceX was recreating NASA research.

Reading such an absurd and idiotic reductionist take on HN just makes me sad. I mostly speaks to you having absolutely zero knowlage about space technology and rocketry.

> moreover fired him for gross incompetence.

They fired him because he had a 10 year business plan to replace banks and become the main monetary system for all payments. A combination of being a bank, an online payment provider and Apple pay.

The other founders wanted to sell the company and make quick cash.

> Subways have been a thing for over a century;

Yeah such an asshole wanting to improve tunneling technology. Only assholes try to improve technology. We should just shoot anybody in the head who tries to improve on technology that is more then 10 years old.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptiv... by hef19898 on Monday April 25, 2022 @08:30AM (#31153500)

The first rockets landed in the 70s, so yeah the tech existed already long ago. It wasn't used because rockets (e.g. Ariane 5) were developed to carry shuttle crat and nobody believed there were enough launches to make reusable rockets worthwhile. There are no shuttles anymore, and whether or not the launch market is big enough isn't sure yet neither.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptiv... by panick21_ on Monday April 25, 2022 @08:59AM (#31153826)

You are continue to embrace yourself and you are not worth talking to. Bye.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter re-examines Elon Musk’s bid, may be more receptiv... by hef19898 on Monday April 25, 2022 @09:13AM (#31154047)

Do you embarrass myself? Because whom I embrace is hardly your business.

[ Parent | on HN ]