Re:Core i9-12900KS World Record: How I Hit 7.8 GHz on 8 Cores
by Wowfunhappy on Saturday April 23, 2022 @10:31AM
(#31134584)
Did you purposefully leave out Broadwell, or was it a mistake? (If it wasn’t a mistake, I’d be interested to hear you expand on why, I know it was a bit of a weird release.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Core i9-12900KS World Record: How I Hit 7.8 GHz on 8 Cores
by DuskStar on Saturday April 23, 2022 @10:58AM
(#31134784)
I think broadwell was a process shift, not a microarchitecture shift.
Re:Core i9-12900KS World Record: How I Hit 7.8 GHz on 8 Cores
by Tostino on Saturday April 23, 2022 @11:00AM
(#31134805)
They also left out the whole Netburst (and it's decedents) arch too.
Re:Core i9-12900KS World Record: How I Hit 7.8 GHz on 8 Cores
by lynguist on Saturday April 23, 2022 @02:19PM
(#31136836)
Netburst is not based on P6 (i686). Core is a development stemming directly from Enhanced Pentium M which stems from Pentium III. All others build on this. Broadwell is Haswell on a new node (14nm instead of 22nm).
Re:Core i9-12900KS World Record: How I Hit 7.8 GHz on 8 Cores
by peterhalburt33 on Saturday April 23, 2022 @12:54PM
(#31135958)
I think Intel would rather we all forget about netburst.