Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by SamPatt on Friday April 22, 2022 @10:40PM
(#31130876)
"The United States was neutral until the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, leading them to enter the war."
I'd say active is still better here.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by suyjuris on Saturday April 23, 2022 @05:22AM
(#31132626)
I would disagree. This sentence is about the Unites States, not Japan, and the use of passive voice reflects that.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by j-krieger on Saturday April 23, 2022 @05:46AM
(#31132729)
This is disingenuous. Removing the bad actor in this sentence removed part of the cause for the effect. Not an attack happened, a japanese attack happened.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by suyjuris on Saturday April 23, 2022 @08:42AM
(#31133777)
I you feel that the actor is an important part of the sentence, you can include it in passive voice as well: “However, it was attacked at Pearl Harbor by Japan, and then chose to enter the war.”
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by alanh on Friday April 22, 2022 @09:26PM
(#31130468)
How and why is that possibly better than saying "the Japanese attacked them at Pearl Harbor"? The passive voice is what enables the omission of the actor.
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ...
by CameronNemo on Friday April 22, 2022 @10:49PM
(#31130916)
Could also just say "the attack on". Then you don't shift focus or use the passive voice.
"The United States had maintained neutrality until 1941. However, it was attacked at Pearl Harbor, and then chose to enter the war."