News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very broken. Parent comment

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by xg15 on Friday April 22, 2022 @01:29PM (#31124954)
Wasn't the x originally a gender thing? As in "folks" is gender neutral while "folx" actively acknowledges non-heteronormative genders.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by tempnow987 on Friday April 22, 2022 @01:44PM (#31125265)
Thank you, very interesting. I'd always taken gender neutral to include non-heteronormative genders. But I started seeing things like folx - confusing because I hadn't understood the word to be gendered or only gender normative.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by dane-pgp on Friday April 22, 2022 @02:11PM (#31125742)
> Thank you

Don't you mean "Thanx"?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by tempnow987 on Friday April 22, 2022 @03:14PM (#31126685)
I think it's a bit unique to folkx because instead of using gendered language (hey guys) folks have moved to hey folks. So I've only seen it on things like that (gender neutral references to other people).
[ Parent | on HN ]