News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very broken. Parent comment

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by svnpenn on Friday April 22, 2022 @12:44PM (#31124115)
Post a screenshot, otherwise I agree with others that you're just lying.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by mgraczyk on Friday April 22, 2022 @12:47PM (#31124172)
That is not allowed (for good reason) and I don't want to get fired, if you work at Google you can ping me and I can send it to you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by burnished on Friday April 22, 2022 @01:30PM (#31124978)
What is that good reason? The only thing I can come up with is "don't release internal documents", which is a blanket reason and not what I'd consider compelling, but I suspect I'm having a failure of imagination
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by umanwizard on Friday April 22, 2022 @02:31PM (#31126013)
Practically no big company would allow you to post internal documents on Hacker News. Why isn't that a good reason?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by burnished on Saturday April 23, 2022 @02:02AM (#31131818)
Because it isn't compelling? It's purely to avoid admitting to something illegal. I presume that this person has a reason that is more nuanced than that, which intrigues me.
[ Parent | on HN ]