News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very broken. Parent comment

Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by mgraczyk on Friday April 22, 2022 @12:25PM (#31123769)
You're welcome to ping me internally. It's in the banned words list (happy to share a link internally) and I double checked policy before posting this comment to make sure I was accurately representing the rules that are applied to me as an employee.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by dekhn on Friday April 22, 2022 @04:00PM (#31127296)
based on dannybee's comments elsewhere, the list you're referring to is actually for external product comms, not internal googler comms.... could you elaborate on your position further?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by mgraczyk on Friday April 22, 2022 @04:06PM (#31127352)
That's not true, there are a few internal-only lists that have different contents (lots of overlap but not 100%). Different PAs have adopted different lists.

This is the public one: https://developers.google.com/style/word-list

I don't want to share the name of the internal one publicly, but anyone at Google can ping me if they want help finding it, or they can search "respectful words"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s AI-powered ‘inclusive warnings’ feature is very ... by kevinventullo on Friday April 22, 2022 @05:01PM (#31128085)
Okay but that’s just a list that someone created. People are allowed to create lists; I’ve never heard of anyone enforcing this list.
[ Parent | on HN ]