I don't really care that the Russian forces have advanced 5 meters compared to yesterday. I've read too many "articles" that said "this guy said X, this other guy said Y, <5 paragraphs of useless context that I've also read in the last 5 articles>". It won't help you understand a topic, unless you're already well-versed in it.

Long-forms like the Economist's take a few steps back from the day-to-day news and try to give you an overview of a topic. That's what I'm interested in. You have to make the difference between the author's opinion and the facts because most of the Economist's pieces are actually op-eds, but that's better than reading re-hashed PR releases all day long.