What's not mentioned in the article is that all new improvements would be the county's responsibility, but that means the county also has to decide to approve those projects.

They could just not spend any money on maintaining or improving Disney roads/ infrastructure until Disney gives them a reason to want to.

Which might mean making Disney "voluntarily" pay off the district's past debt as well as agreeing to pay for new projects before any new ones get approved.

Disney wouldn’t have much trouble flooding county elections with money. One election cycle of delays then business as usual

Maybe- but that's a mess they'd rather avoid. And one that could backfire on them.

Which is why before cutting state political donations entirely, they contributed to pretty much all candidates.

I agree, I think you’re entirely right. Why settle for only funding one side when you can throw money everywhere