Re:Musk announces funding secured for Twitter buy
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Thursday April 21, 2022 @03:41PM
(#31114279)
Wealth taxes and land value taxes seem like the most sane way to fund social programs. Extract a bit of value from the people who have runaway wealth (but not so much that their wealth can't continue to grow), and use it to help the economically downtrodden become more upwardly mobile (education, healthcare, basic social safety nets.)
Pair it with a hefty pigeuvian carbon tax and you could probably do away with income taxes entirely.
(A nondistortionary VAT to replace sales taxes and corporate income taxes would be nice as well.)
Re:Musk announces funding secured for Twitter buy
by koprulusector on Thursday April 21, 2022 @03:51PM
(#31114383)
Like Georgism? Which, by the way, imagines the land tax alone being enough to eliminate personal income taxes.
Re:Musk announces funding secured for Twitter buy
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Thursday April 21, 2022 @04:38PM
(#31114870)
Yes, I am a Georgist.
To me, taxing wealth and only wealth seems like the most straightforward route to a truly progressive tax system. That’s not to say it’s simple or straightforward in an absolute sense, but neither is taxing income, is it?
At a high level, taxing wealth instead of income or transactions ensures that rich people are paying their share, while maximizing upward mobility so that people can become rich more easily. Think about how much easier it would be to become wealthy without income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, taxes on corporate profits, etc. etc.
This is what we should optimize for imho: making it as easy as possible to become wealthy. Sure, there details to figure out, as with any approach, and maybe some rich people will face some difficult choices or be forced to sell assets; I’m ok with that and it seems well worth the tradeoff.