Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA...
by withinboredom on Thursday April 21, 2022 @06:11AM
(#31107656)
An empty tank is a more dangerous tank. An empty tank is full of vapor, which is the bit that explodes, not liquid.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA...
by hutzlibu on Thursday April 21, 2022 @06:52AM
(#31107871)
But after that, there is no more gasoline left for burning.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA...
by withinboredom on Thursday April 21, 2022 @07:38AM
(#31108169)
A tank full of gas won't explode if punctured, but there might be a fire if it leaks near something hot enough. An empty tank will explode with just the slightest spark. A half tank just depends on where it gets punctured, but with gravity and all, it's likely to be the bottom half that gets punctured.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA...
by throwaway0a5e on Thursday April 21, 2022 @08:47AM
(#31108678)
Cars use in-tank pumps turned by brushed electric motors. Why don't they blow up when empty?
Even in an empty fuel tank the vapors are way to rich to ignite. You might get a good flash if you introduce air and ignition at the same time but odds are you won't get any sort of sustained fire.
Re:A YouTuber purposely crashed his plane in California, FAA...
by mannykannot on Thursday April 21, 2022 @08:53AM
(#31108719)
On the other hand, TWA 800.