I guess "criminal activity" may have been the wrong phrase. "Illegal activity" is more what I meant. Because not all illegal activity is adjudicated by a court, and a regulatory action by the FAA is one of those things.

It's pretty obvious, but I guess we could suspend his pay and if he ends up being guilty youtube can donate the proceeds.

There may be no meaningful legal sanction for this.

Many jurisdictions have ways to seize profits of crime, and just about all have ways to punish crime including paying fines and restitution.

Don't you think it would be better to go through a system which has (at least a semblance of) due process, fairness, and transparency about the rules? Yes yes I know I know, "they're a private company they can do what they want". I'm not wondering what they can do, more flabbergasted about the apparent sudden and large support for corporations acting to censor and punish people like this.