Re:On anti-crypto toxicity
by miohtama on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @10:15AM
(#31097281)
Thank you for heads up. I hope I was transparent enough with my content marketing efforts not to be rude and spammy. Maybe you can clarify if it is against HackerNews rules to link my own posts?
I agree, Uniswap has its issues with scams. Even with added compliance and listing policy, it is highly likely to be most cost efficient. For example what we can do is that we focus only known good trading pairs like Bitcoin and Ethereum that are not scams. These are not scams and they still trade more efficiently on Uniswap.
There are efficiencies you do not see in traditional financial systems like
- Open source
- Open data
- Open ledger
I think the most relevant talking point is about the open source. We know Linux beat UNIXes on the server market. We know Android beat Microsoft Windows Phone.
More about this in-depth in the blog post, of course.
I agree, Uniswap has its issues with scams. Even with added compliance and listing policy, it is highly likely to be most cost efficient. For example what we can do is that we focus only known good trading pairs like Bitcoin and Ethereum that are not scams. These are not scams and they still trade more efficiently on Uniswap.
There are efficiencies you do not see in traditional financial systems like - Open source - Open data - Open ledger
I think the most relevant talking point is about the open source. We know Linux beat UNIXes on the server market. We know Android beat Microsoft Windows Phone.
More about this in-depth in the blog post, of course.