Re:QEMU 7.0
by hoistbypetard on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @09:29AM
(#31096626)
These weren't un-executed ideas, though. I think it lines up very well with my general sense that the best way to get to a really good implementation of something is to publish one that's lacking in some way that annoys people. Then you have an idea plus something people can contribute work to improve.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:QEMU 7.0
by anderspitman on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @01:09PM
(#31099969)
> These weren't un-executed ideas, though
I think you're straw-manning what I said a bit.
Re:QEMU 7.0
by hoistbypetard on Wednesday April 20, 2022 @03:12PM
(#31101562)
Not intentionally… I am arguing that “Almost seems to challenge the common assertion that execution is more important than a great idea” is not the case. Because these ideas were executed.