just what kind of scraper you have is a concern.
does scraper just want a bunch of stock images;
or does scraper have FOMO on web trinkets;
or does scraper want to mirror/impersonate your site.
the last option is the most concerning because then;
scraper is mirroring bcz your site is cool and local UI/UX is wanted;
or is scraper phishing smishing or otherwise duping your users.
I feel that ruling should have the caveat that if a fair cost paid API version for getting publicly listed data then the scrapers must legally use that (say no more than 5% more than cost of CPU/bandwidth/etc of the scraping behaviour); ideally a rule too that at minimum there be a delay if they are republishing that data without your permission, so at least you as the platform/source/reason for the data being up-to-date aren't harmed too - which may then kill the source platform over time if regular visitors somehow start going to the competitor publishing the data.