News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by formerly_proven on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:37PM (#31075398)
> It certainly did an enormous needless destruction of non-human (and human) habitat. This era only lasted a couple of decades and ended with a comprehensive test ban in the 1990s.

PTBT happened in the early 60s, so almost all surface tests were conducted within the first twenty years of developing nukes. I don't think making "craters" in desert mines really qualifies as enormous destruction of habitats.

Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by runarberg on Monday April 18, 2022 @05:16PM (#31076663)
Yes the second and third decades of nuclear weapons testing were definitely more destructive then the following. The Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963 definitely helped slowing down the destruction by a lot. However e.g. France—a non signatory—continued detonating their nuclear bombs above ground on and around their pacific island territories well into the 70s. The environmental damage (and damage to the nearby human communities) is still very much present today.

But the fact that the PTBT was signed by most nuclear states which slowed down this pointless destruction—and later the CTBT, which almost stopped it in 1997—shows that even humans with our demonstrable aggressiveness do work to limit our destruction when said destruction doesn’t contribute to the enrichment of a subset of other members of the species.