News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:08PM (#31074321)
Are they actively attempting a hostile takeover and the board thinks that they'll hurt the company? Then I think that'd be legal. Otherwise I don't see how you could make a legally defensible argument around diluting shareholders just because of their beliefs
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by ffggvv on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:15PM (#31074392)
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:20PM (#31074456)
They were elected to the board by shareholders. That's entirely different than a hostile takeover. You can't say "this is not in the interest of the shareholders" when the shareholders voted for it
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by ffggvv on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:25PM (#31074534)
then lets dilute the shareholders who voted for it as theyh are clearly idealogically driven and actively hostile to the company itself or its profitability
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:22PM (#31075224)
Yea... you're stretching this one
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by ffggvv on Tuesday April 19, 2022 @12:03PM (#31084979)
i dont see why. isnt that why they are saying elon is bad? because hes driving for free speech?

why is it okay if its one person, or a few people, but >n bad actors is fine?

Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u... by orhmeh09 on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:20PM (#31074452)
Why do you think they dont?