Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u...
by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:08PM
(#31074321)
Are they actively attempting a hostile takeover and the board thinks that they'll hurt the company? Then I think that'd be legal. Otherwise I don't see how you could make a legally defensible argument around diluting shareholders just because of their beliefs
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u...
by ffggvv on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:15PM
(#31074392)
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/investing/exxon-shareholders-...
in this case yes. wonder why they dont
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u...
by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:20PM
(#31074456)
They were elected to the board by shareholders. That's entirely different than a hostile takeover. You can't say "this is not in the interest of the shareholders" when the shareholders voted for it
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u...
by ffggvv on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:25PM
(#31074534)
then lets dilute the shareholders who voted for it as theyh are clearly idealogically driven and actively hostile to the company itself or its profitability
Re:Twitter takeover battle: Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey turn u...
by goodoldneon on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:22PM
(#31075224)
Yea... you're stretching this one