Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by e3bc54b2 on Monday April 18, 2022 @06:42AM
(#31069158)
> Also, I think that looking at history, claim that all progress was due to unreasonable men is false.
This is because the definition of 'unreasonable' is relative. For Edison, wasting thousands of hours of lightbulb experiment was quite reasonable.
For most people before him, it was squarely in the unreasonable territory, and hence it took Edison for lightbulb to happen.
Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by halostatue on Monday April 18, 2022 @01:19PM
(#31073671)
Except that Edison didn’t invent the electric light bulb (first invented in 1806).
https://www.ripleys.com/weird-news/or-not-thomas-edison-ligh...
Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by pydry on Monday April 18, 2022 @07:43AM
(#31069469)
Hard to argue that Stallman has done that. The perpetual character assassination attempts (e.g. the failed cancelation attempt from a year or two ago) merely serve to underscore this.
Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by peoplefromibiza on Monday April 18, 2022 @06:57AM
(#31069241)
> Tho, those unreasonable men also fairly often cause quite a lot of damage to their own causes and to world in general
did they?
I think that in history those that caused quite a lot of damage to the World are those that laughed at unreasonable men, thinking they could not achieve anything substantial.
Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead or wearing toothbrush moustache, is purely coincidental
Also, I think that looking at history, claim that all progress was due to unreasonable men is false.