Re:The off-screen workers who keep the adult webcam industry...
by anamax on Sunday April 17, 2022 @01:34PM
(#31062571)
What are the odds that FedNow will service the adult industry?
Re:The off-screen workers who keep the adult webcam industry...
by Nasrudith on Sunday April 17, 2022 @05:40PM
(#31064741)
Pretty good given the first ammendment and lack of other rationale such as scarcity of airwaved. A pretext to deny would be difficult for domestic companies.
Re:The off-screen workers who keep the adult webcam industry...
by anamax on Sunday April 17, 2022 @07:54PM
(#31065723)
The feds have been pressuring financial services companies to "de-platform" legal businesses, including those in the adult industry, for years.
The govt's pretext has been "reputational risk." Isn't it nice of the feds to tell a bank that "someone" might not think well of them if they provide services to "those" people?
It is established law that a business that acts at govt behest is a state actor, so that "pressure" is enough to bring the 1st amendment in. That is, if there's a 1st amendment argument. However, said de-plaforming doesn't seem to succumbed to a 1st amendment challenge.
Maybe such a business would win with a first amendment argument on FedNow, but how many can survive until that decision comes down?
Re:The off-screen workers who keep the adult webcam industry...
by lotsofpulp on Sunday April 17, 2022 @08:05PM
(#31065799)
>The feds have been pressuring financial services companies to "de-platform" legal businesses, including those in the adult industry, for years.
Source? I have never heard of this.
Re:The off-screen workers who keep the adult webcam industry...
by anamax on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:10AM
(#31068166)
https://frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/