Re:Twitter board adopts poison pill after Musk’s $43B bid to...
by beebmam on Saturday April 16, 2022 @03:50AM
(#31050500)
Why should a company be forced to carry, host, and service the speech of others?
If Twitter is a monopoly, apply anti-trust laws to it and break it up.
If Twitter isn't a monopoly, then they should every right to decide what their service does, as long as it's within the law. If you don't like the current laws, change them.
I am totally, 100% opposed to privately owned companies being forced to carry speech that they don't want to carry. That itself is a violation of the free speech of people that operate businesses.
If Twitter is a monopoly, apply anti-trust laws to it and break it up. If Twitter isn't a monopoly, then they should every right to decide what their service does, as long as it's within the law. If you don't like the current laws, change them.
I am totally, 100% opposed to privately owned companies being forced to carry speech that they don't want to carry. That itself is a violation of the free speech of people that operate businesses.