Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:23PM
(#31035224)
NASA can probably trade the tech, if it even barely works, for budget from the Pentagon. This is a ballistic launch system without the tell of a rocket burn.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by dotnet00 on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:57PM
(#31035499)
The Pentagon is already looking at them: https://spacenews.com/spinlaunch-joins-cadre-of-small-launch...
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by gnramires on Thursday April 14, 2022 @05:16PM
(#31033409)
I haven't seen Scott Manley's video; but if the mass cost of a heatshield is so significant that's a problem.
However, there's a benefit in this case: heat shield probably scales with area (often something like mass^(2/3)), making it progressively less significant compared to fuel mass (which is roughly a constant fraction, i.e. it scales like mass^(1)). I think a high altitude launch site could make a significant difference as well (although that creates other logistic inconveniences). Atmospheric pressure approximately halves every 5km, and air resistance is roughly proportional to pressure.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by kurthr on Thursday April 14, 2022 @07:20PM
(#31034732)
Building and SpinLaunching at above 10k feet (3km) seems like a no-brainer. It reduces heating and weight while increasing terminal altitude substantially... like 2x.
It would be more efficient, if they could use a whip effect to (match impedance) capture much more of the rotational energy they put into the spin, more like a trebuchet.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by sacrosancty on Friday April 15, 2022 @02:44AM
(#31037224)
Is optimizing efficiency relevant at all? I'd think the electrical power cost must be negligible compared to the rest of the cost of a launch.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by edrxty on Friday April 15, 2022 @02:57AM
(#31037279)
It's not the electrical cost so much as system complexity. They could use less heat shield, more payload, spin the payload less hard, etc.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i...
by Schroedingersat on Friday April 15, 2022 @08:44AM
(#31039558)
Is there any material strong enough to provide the whip? Or would you just make the spinning part slower?
Edit: the video in question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Phy3n_S3ng
and a more honest and detailed look at the company, again from Scott: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAczd3mt3X0