News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by dotnet00 on Thursday April 14, 2022 @05:02PM (#31033253)
I think their basic idea is sound, it'll probably eventually function. My concerns are if it'll be worth it, since there's a trade-off being made between fuel mass and heat shield mass, and at least based on Scott Manley's summary video this week, the rocket with the heat shield is close to the same mass as the Electron rocket. In which case I'm not sure the complexity of SpinLaunch is worth it.

Edit: the video in question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Phy3n_S3ng

and a more honest and detailed look at the company, again from Scott: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAczd3mt3X0

Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by JumpCrisscross on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:23PM (#31035224)
NASA can probably trade the tech, if it even barely works, for budget from the Pentagon. This is a ballistic launch system without the tell of a rocket burn.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by dotnet00 on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:57PM (#31035499)
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by gnramires on Thursday April 14, 2022 @05:16PM (#31033409)
I haven't seen Scott Manley's video; but if the mass cost of a heatshield is so significant that's a problem.

However, there's a benefit in this case: heat shield probably scales with area (often something like mass^(2/3)), making it progressively less significant compared to fuel mass (which is roughly a constant fraction, i.e. it scales like mass^(1)). I think a high altitude launch site could make a significant difference as well (although that creates other logistic inconveniences). Atmospheric pressure approximately halves every 5km, and air resistance is roughly proportional to pressure.

Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by kurthr on Thursday April 14, 2022 @07:20PM (#31034732)
Building and SpinLaunching at above 10k feet (3km) seems like a no-brainer. It reduces heating and weight while increasing terminal altitude substantially... like 2x.

It would be more efficient, if they could use a whip effect to (match impedance) capture much more of the rotational energy they put into the spin, more like a trebuchet.

Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by sacrosancty on Friday April 15, 2022 @02:44AM (#31037224)
Is optimizing efficiency relevant at all? I'd think the electrical power cost must be negligible compared to the rest of the cost of a launch.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by edrxty on Friday April 15, 2022 @02:57AM (#31037279)
It's not the electrical cost so much as system complexity. They could use less heat shield, more payload, spin the payload less hard, etc.
Re:NASA will test SpinLaunch's ability to fling satellites i... by Schroedingersat on Friday April 15, 2022 @08:44AM (#31039558)
Is there any material strong enough to provide the whip? Or would you just make the spinning part slower?