News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by mattbuilds on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:33AM (#31026034)
Agreed but I do think a lot of people project into the future about “what could be a problem” and solve for that. I would guess it’s very common. I’ve seen it done and done it myself. You say to yourself “well if this becomes popular, I won’t want people to know the next word”, which sounds reasonable but it stops things from getting done.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by pdpi on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:55AM (#31026311)
Hence the "actually understanding" part, that's precisely the point. What is, vs what could be.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by bashinator on Thursday April 14, 2022 @12:46PM (#31029506)
A hard lesson I've learned for naming things, is that it's almost always better to name something for what it _is_, _right now_, than for what you think it should eventually become.