News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:135 Terabytes for $12,000 by bradfa on Wednesday October 12, 2011 @08:10AM (#3102588)
If you (or someone you know) has a write up detailing these statements and tests showing them to be true, I'd be very interested in reading more about this. Please do share.

It sounds like what you're saying makes sense, from a drive business and manufacturing perspective.

Re:135 Terabytes for $12,000 by wazoox on Wednesday October 12, 2011 @10:02AM (#3102955)
> If you (or someone you know) has a write up detailing these statements and tests showing them to be true, I'd be very interested in reading more about this. Please do share.

This is NDA information :) I'm repeating what I've heard from drive makers and my experience after setting up several thousands of RAID systems. I didn't made tests recently, but vibrations can kill an array performance. I've seen a chassis where the central drive slot (among 24) wasn't usable because it vibrated more than the others :)