News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by Hamuko on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:09AM (#31025801)
Unfortunately it also allows to rob other people of the fun, as there has been multiple Twitter bots spreading the future words. I think one even replied to people's Wordle score tweets.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by bko on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:24AM (#31025940)
If it weren't stored in the JS, the twitter bots could have just played the game quickly and found the answer. Making is slightly more annoying wouldn't deter them.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by Hamuko on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:36AM (#31026087)
That'd only apply to today's answer. Now they're able to tweet the answers for the next week.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by Xylakant on Thursday April 14, 2022 @10:27AM (#31027497)
Don’t you think that a bot could not brute force everyday’s wordle every morning for a tiny amount of processing power? There are solving strategies out there that will solve it with a minimum amount of attempts. So all it would do is add a tiny delay to todays bot being a nuisance.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by S1ngleM4lt on Thursday April 14, 2022 @12:34PM (#31029317)
That’s still slightly different though. If the bots were just for today’s word, and I were the type of person who likes posting my streaks, I could realistically avoid checking twitter until I’ve solved today’s puzzle. If instead the bots are posting future solutions, it’s much harder to avoid having something spoiled.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by chme on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:16AM (#31025874)
Well... Aren't the twitter bots then the bad actor?

I wouldn't complain that wikipedia exists when I am answering a quiz...

I don't think a more complex wordle implementation would solve this. If the whole world is guessing the same word, there will always be someone that tries to spoil it for others, just because they can.

Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by electroly on Thursday April 14, 2022 @10:20AM (#31027407)
> Well... Aren't the twitter bots then the bad actor?

Of course. But what does that matter? All you've done is assign blame. The person still had their game experience ruined. With a different design, that might not have been possible. This is like spam protection -- it's not Gmail's fault that you're receiving spam, but they're the ones in a position to stop it.

Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by shuntress on Thursday April 14, 2022 @10:47AM (#31027723)
At a certain point, it becomes more efficient to consider it societies problem.

If bad actors in person went door-to-door attempting to break in by picking locks, would you say that it is purely the responsibility of the homeowner to ensure that their locks are strong enough?

Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by electroly on Thursday April 14, 2022 @06:41PM (#31034316)
At a "certain point" sure, but I don't think Wordle spoilers rise to the level of "society-level" problems. If we're not at that point with spam email, I can't imagine we're at that point with Wordle spoilers.
Re:The New York Times has requested that I shut the archive ... by WilTimSon on Thursday April 14, 2022 @08:15AM (#31025863)
That's a good example of how just a few malicious knobs ruin the fun for everyone else. I suppose blocking those bots isn't difficult but the fact that someone went out of their way to code one is so sad.