And, as is always the question, to what extent is this one-off example representative of the totality of Facebook's efforts to stop the spread of misinformation?

Are 50% of the "censored" posts regular reporting? 1%? 0.00001%? Shouldn't a detail like that matter?

If I could make the rules, my rule for conversations about one-off examples would be that you have to immediately follow up by talking about how representative that example is of the phenomenon you are using it to illustrate.