We decided to move 90% of our workload from the cloud to on-prem infrastructure

Re:We decided to move 90% of our workload from the cloud to ... by stephbu on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @04:28PM (#31019832)

I think I covered those poin in calling out the cost model elements - renting the “bottom third” of the costs via managed facilities, BMaaS etc. helps in terms of reducing or eliminating capital expenses and some human toil especially in a more stable business that doesn’t benefit from per-minute lease terms or multi-year. As I called out elsewhere, sizing the hosting model to the economic model is really important.

Even in the pure rental or managed BMaaS, the human cost can quickly dominate the economic model. Owning machines and OS’s is expensive at anything more than a couple of racks of machines. Eliminating people and human change/release from touching things in the datacenter is probably the first priority. Otherwise it is hard to consistently drive that human number down and meet service quality expectations for 24x7.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We decided to move 90% of our workload from the cloud to ... by vidarh on Thursday April 14, 2022 @05:12AM (#31024737)

If human costs dominate, you're doing something very wrong, and in any case renting the services only obscure this, and you can externalise that just as easily with managed servers by outsourcing the management.

What is truly expensive is buying a bundled service with massive margins.

Sometimes you have the luxury of not caring, e.g. when building very high margin, low scale tools where human costs dominate due to dev or other parts of the business, but for anything that starts requiring hosting costs beyond even as low as a couple of k a month, you're leaving money on the table.

[ Parent | on HN ]