Re:We decided to move 90% of our workload from the cloud to ...
by treis on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @02:07PM
(#31018072)
Containers running some work load dying is a lot different from a HDD going kaput on your production DB server. Or someone compromising your file system and encrypting all of your user uploads.
I don't think anyone is claiming it's a particularly hard problem. It's the opposite. We're talking about 1 hour a month. Even that little effort still ~$200 a month and a $200 a month managed DB instance is pretty beefy.
Re:We decided to move 90% of our workload from the cloud to ...
by vidarh on Thursday April 14, 2022 @05:26AM
(#31024784)
None of this is any different I a cloud setup. You still need to check the integrity of your backups. You still need to have appropriate failover. The effort is pretty much the same. In a competent setup it's automated, so you're not spending an hour a month per server. Not even for the production DB server, because you have replicas and setups to automate the switch, and setups to bring back snapshots from backups.
Been there, done that, many times, and I know exactly what it costs people, because I billed by the hour for it, and your cost assumptions are just way off.
I've set up more than one hybrid setup where you didn't need to know if your workload was running in AWS or Hetzner or somewhere else, so we could use AWS for elasticity and Hetzner to keep cost down.
This is not a hard problem. And if people don't have the right skills in house, it's easy to outsource this (I for one used to make my living of automating setups like this and operating them on a retainer basis).