Re:135 Terabytes for $12,000
by VikingCoder on Wednesday October 12, 2011 @09:28AM
(#3102822)
why are you building a datacenter on a floodplain?
Every spot in our solar system is susceptible to some unrecoverable disaster. If you don't want to lose your data, you have to have copies in more than one physical location.
Yeah, I'll get right on that Mars mirror.
Seriously, I didn't say he was wrong in theory, but focusing so much attention on the highly unlikely to the detriment of the exceedingly common is a drastic distortion of the issue, and a cost/benefit analysis skewed in either direction can have costly repercussions.
just curious but do you have any data for SSD in use?
No, I've not dealt with enough of them for long enough to have anything meaningful to say on the subject. So far I've not even had one clearly die (though there have been some very odd transient incidents.)
Jeff Atwood made an interesting post on that very subject a while back, though:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid...
In contrast, I lose 5-10% of the spinning HDDs I care about every year.