Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by numeri on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @02:57AM
(#31011904)
This is the real reason they received so few donations. I've only ever donated to them through Brave's Attention Tokens [1], so I never realized they use BitPay, but it really is intrusive.
1. I wonder if they'll keep this enabled or not?
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by gwd on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @04:28AM
(#31012356)
> 1. I wonder if they'll keep this enabled or not?
I was wondering the same thing -- hopefully they will, as I'd like to see that model succeed.
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by kuschku on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @06:14AM
(#31012942)
> required prospective donors to provide an obscene amount of personal data
Yes, that’s known as KYC laws, which are required if you’re a payment processor of any kind.
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by flotzam on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @06:43AM
(#31013096)
Seems more like preemptive overcompliance. Plenty of reputable charities accept anonymous donations just fine, whether it's cryptocurrency or cash by mail.
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by marcinzm on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @09:11AM
(#31014180)
Given the financial size, global scope and dislike by certain governments of Wikipedia I see preemptive overcompliance as a very sane option.
Re:Wikipedia RFC to stop accepting cryptocurrencies passes b...
by stjohnswarts on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @11:29AM
(#31015839)
This is a flaw in a service. Turning down free money isn't wise for a service that needs charity (from whatever sources) to continue existing.
It's a high friction, culture-clashing payment flow. I certainly noped out of that form real fast.
For comparison: https://www.givedirectly.org/crypto/
And another campaign on The Giving Block, an anonymity friendly donation payment processor: https://thegivingblock.com/campaigns/ukraine-emergency-respo...