News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The fake artists problem on streaming platforms by tyrfing on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:27PM (#31008435)
> What makes the artists fake is that they are publishing only a couple songs for the specific purpose of providing the streaming platform with royalty free music

The article has 3 examples. Two have easily identified 3rd-party labels, the last is unclear. Neither is a traditional label, but there is also no indication they are owned by Spotify.

> People buy it expecting a curated playlist of music they want to hear, and instead what they get is a curated playlist of music that sounds similar to what they want to hear.

What bands would people expect in a playlist of background music? In fact, one is from a provider of royalty-free background music - which seems like exactly what you would expect in such a playlist. You could argue that it's not really jazz, which is understandable, but I'll file that gripe along with my anger that "New Metal Tracks" features lots of metalcore.

Re:The fake artists problem on streaming platforms by Semaphor on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @01:06AM (#31011382)
> but I'll file that gripe along with my anger that "New Metal Tracks" features lots of metalcore.

Metalcore is the top 100 music of metal, I doubt it’s going to change anytime soon. I’d guess what ever is not metalcore, is probably cheesy power metal like Sabaton or Gloryhammer.

Re:The fake artists problem on streaming platforms by aimor on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:54PM (#31008694)
I definitely had the wrong impression of how much music was produced by the examples given. It's not just "two songs and dissolve".