Re:Are film critics losing sync with audiences?
by gotaquestion on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:09PM
(#31007678)
I thought the reboots were in order to retain property rights, and that with 2-3 years between reboots aimed at teens, there are a new batch of teens. So it seems like a win-win: renew property rights and lure in the new batch of teens.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Are film critics losing sync with audiences?
by aidenn0 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:40PM
(#31007987)
That's specifically true only for Spiderman I think. Reportedly[1] Sony loses the rights if they go too long without producing a Spiderman film.
1: This is treated as fact in many places, but was very hard for me to source. The most definitive statement I could find was contemporary with the MGM/Sony dispute being resolved:
> The Marvel-Sony contract requires the studio to begin production of a Spider-Man feature quickly; the actual deadline could not be obtained. It also places Columbia on a short leash in scheduling sequels, requiring in some cases that financing for a sequel be arranged within months of the release of the previous feature[2].
2: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-mar-02-fi-13115...