Re:Postmortem assessment of olfactory tissue degeneration in...
by timr on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:00PM
(#31007582)
It's a medical paper. It isn't written for non-practitioners, and if you don't understand it, the best thing to do is not to speculate, but to reserve judgment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Postmortem assessment of olfactory tissue degeneration in...
by slg on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:43PM
(#31008016)
I don't know what your point is considering I never speculated about anything in these comments. Ironically enough, you seem to be speculating about what people might speculate about when they see that headline.
Re:Postmortem assessment of olfactory tissue degeneration in...
by timr on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:02PM
(#31008198)
> I'm a layperson. Like many laypeople, I would have no idea what the "olfactory bulb" was if I saw it in a headline...It certainly sounds like "brain" is a fair and accurate summary.
Re:Postmortem assessment of olfactory tissue degeneration in...
by slg on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:13PM
(#31008293)
It is funny how something starts to seem more like speculation when you conveniently throw an ellipsis over the part in which I cite the source where the "speculation" came from.
I wasn't speculating. I was quoting Wikipedia.