A tiny Docker image to serve static websites

Re:A tiny Docker image to serve static websites by nitinagg on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @12:57PM (#31005271)

For static websites, hosting them directly on S3 with cloudfront, or on cloudflare might be a better option?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A tiny Docker image to serve static websites by flatiron on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @08:18PM (#31009770)

How’s the free tier on aws for s3 and cloudfront? I can think of free alternatives that are equally as good if not better.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A tiny Docker image to serve static websites by hedora on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @10:03AM (#31014763)

S3 + cloudfront + lambda is costing me pennies per month for a trivial site. What are the free alternatives that beat it?

Requirements:

- rsync style publishing

- not supported by tracking users.

- raw static file hosting (including html)

- redirect foo.com/bar to foo.com/bar/index.html (this is why I need lambda...)

- zero admin https certificate management

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A tiny Docker image to serve static websites by flatiron on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @06:23PM (#31021035)

GitHub pages gives you all this except the redirect and replace rclone with…git and is free (although evil Microsoft blah blah)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A tiny Docker image to serve static websites by MuffinFlavored on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @12:59PM (#31005301)

[ Parent | on HN ]