My point wasn't to dismiss your anecdotal evidence, but just to highlight that the number per capita can be easily misleading. Yes Amtrak doesn't serve a lot of the US and IIRC has effectively only a single high-speed line. But the average German citizen is using high-speed railway 100 times more often than the average US citizen (for the obvious reasons we both mentioned). You're just not the average citizen.
I'm pretty sure many Germans don't use the ICE at all. While service is a lot better, the way to and from the high-speed train station often makes it inefficient, especially because the German autobahn is also world-class and doesn't suffer from a "last miles" problem.
Re:Europe is investing heavily in trains
by beaconstudios on Monday April 11, 2022 @06:43PM
(#30996070)
You probably just travel more than most people. Also, America is much bigger than any given European country and that leads to greater travel distances.
Re:Europe is investing heavily in trains
by bobthepanda on Monday April 11, 2022 @08:20PM
(#30996993)
America is much bigger, but there’s also something to be said about size and perceptions.
As a general example, the Midwest is roughly the same size and population as France, so if we made the investment we could reasonably have a regional high speed network centered on Chicago. We’ll never have coast to coast high speed rail, but having a few regional networks is certainly doable.
Re:Europe is investing heavily in trains
by jerrybender on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @10:55PM
(#31010720)
There are only 4 states with no Amtrak stations
I'm not expecting to have them be similar numbers. My original point was purely anecdotal - I usually take 1-3 Amtrak rides a year and I don't even live in a part of the country that has good Amtrak service. It's odd to me that folks in a country with much better service use it less than I feel like I would use Amtrak if I could.